bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Stephen Gower < socks-openstreetmap....@earth.li> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) > wrote: > > > > and [Neither cycling nor pushing allowed] would be an area/route > > explicitly signed as e.g. "no bicycles not even pushed" (Oxford > > University Parks used to be like this until a couple of years ago). > > Just for the record, this is still the case in Oxford University Parks, > they > had a few months trial of allowing people to push bikes, and shortly after > the trial was over they put up the current, explicit signs: > http://cycle.st/p53524 http://cycle.st/p53525 (text reads "NO CYCLES > WHETHER > RIDDEN OR NOT") > The same is also true of Christ Church Meadows: http://cycle.st/p17860 > http://cycle.st/p17861 > > Given people seem to be saying bicycle=no doesn't correspond to this > situation I'd be grateful for a tag, likely to be supported by routing > software etc, that does. > > s > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging