This all really sounds like a job for relations, similar to enforcement relations.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > Regardless of whether or not a direction tag is considered I think the > following three items should be met: > > 1. Should be consistent for both mapping signs and signals. At least for > stop signs in the areas I drive, they seem to present the same mapping > issues (location to mark, directionality of traffic they control, etc.) as > traffic signals. > > 2. Should be easy for non-expert mappers to add and edit. Relations are > conceptually nice for many things. But the tools to make them easy to add > and especially to edit seem to be difficult for many users. > > 3. Should be easy for the data consumers to parse and use. No so much > worried about display purposes as for routing in this case. > > I personally find the traffic_signal:direction tag to be clunky, but it is > in the wiki for traffic signals where many/most mappers will find it. And > traffic signals are a member of the same class as stop and yield signs in > my mind: Things that control right of way at an intersection. > > -Tod > > On Mon, November 4, 2013 3:42 pm, fly wrote: > > Please not again forward/backward on nodes. We have direction for nodes > > only need to state if you mean the driving direction or the facing > > direction. > > > > cu fly > > > > > > Am 05.11.2013 00:16, schrieb Tod Fitch: > >> A fifth method might be to use forward and backward tags on the node > >> where the sign is tagged much like one of the suggested methods for > >> tagging traffic signals. > >> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traffic_signal#Tag_all_incoming_ways > >> > >> Seems like one uniform way of tagging traffic control signs and signals > >> should be possible and desirable. > >> > >> Tod > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity. > >> > >> "Balázs Barcsik" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi There! > >> > >> I would like to introduce give_way and stop alerts into navigation > >> tools such as OSMAnd. > >> For this approach a good tagging is needed. So when someone driving > >> and arrives to an intersection then the app would show give way or > >> stop depending on which road he/she is. (or nothing if the road is a > >> priority one) > >> > >> Can you help me define this in a proper way? > >> > >> I think there are several options: > >> > >> 1. extend highway=give_way (and stop) to able to use on ways > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way > >> 2. define a new tag: priority_road=give_way (stop) > >> link to existing > >> tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Apriority_road > >> 3. define new tag: priority=give_way (stop) > >> link to existing > >> tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:priority > >> 4. define new type - priority: > >> link to my > >> proposal: > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_relation:priority > >> > >> Thanks, Balazs > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> Tagging mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Tagging mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
