Hi André, Am Donnerstag, 28. November 2013, 16:15:39 schrieb André Pirard: > So, I thought that this fuzzy matter had to be be solved by writing a > simple syntax diagram. Should anything be wrong in it, someone would put > it right and it would be a good job jobbed and a big step forward.
If you add wrong information in the most prominent spot in a very popular article, one can expect two outcomes: (1) someone might correct the mistake (2) people start tagging the wrong way In the last two months, only (2) happened. > And now, probably in thanks for my contribution, my diagram was adorned > with this: > > Warning <http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/File:Ambox_warning_pn.svg> > The syntax diagram below had no proper discussion and vote, and > conflicts with established tagging. *Don't use it!* Yes, that was me, in reaction to (2). > It is obviously something very difficult to understand that a diagram > translating an article needs no discussion nor vote but needs to be > corrected to align with the obscure explanations by their gurus. Else, > it's the article itself that suffers from lack of discussion and vote. > That remark still doesn't say what's wrong in the diagram. Okay, here is a (probably incomplete) list: - "open" and "closed" appear to be some new invention - the meaning of "off" is wrong - daily, weekly, monthly don't exist in that form. It is perfectly valid to combine them, e.g. Apr-Oct Mo-Fr 07:00-20:00 > I know that the diagram is wrong […] …and you don't mind that mappers follow the wrong diagram? Eckhart _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
