I would make two multipolygon relations, not site, and put no tags on the area.
2014-01-28 Ronnie Soak <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I'd like to get some opinions on a mapping/tagging problem I have here. > > Usually I would tag an amenity (inside a building) that is enclosed by an > area that is clearly part > of the amenity (like playgrounds around a kindergarten, outdoor area of a > botanical garden) *not* on the building (or even a node inside it) but on > the enclosure of that area. > If not everything inside that area would belong to that amenity, I would > use a site relation instead. > > I'd probably double the address tags though to keep a full dataset on both > the amenity and the building, > > > Now I have the case where two amenities share the same outdoor area. (Both > buildings lie within it and both use it.) So now where to tag the > amenities? I can't mix both tag sets on the outline of the area. > But tagging only the buildings now would leave the area without a tag at > all (except maybe barrier = fence) and without a connection to the amenity. > > One solution I can think off is to give some kind of landuse=* tag to the > area and than include it in two different site relations containing the > buildings each. Although I'm not a friend of bogus landuse tags if it's > really not obviously a single usage. > > Or, as this is conceptualy the same problem as multiple amenities inside a > building, tag only the buildings and leave the area (maybe as a landuse=* > too) without connection to it as we do with amenity-nodes inside an > otherwise un-tagged building. > > Do you have a better solution? > > Thanks, > Chaos > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
