Hi Ronnia, as the use case was an outer area shared by two amenities in different building, it's a multipolygon with one outer and one inner member, and that should be fairly common around the world, as it's the most simple case for an osm multipolygon, right?
regards Peter Am 28.01.2014 12:20, schrieb Ronnie Soak: > 2014/1/28 Janko Mihelić <[email protected]> > >> I would make two multipolygon relations, not site, and put no tags on the >> area. >> >> > Could you explain why? > > A multipoligon relation with just one outer member > is not common practice (at least not here in my region.) > > Regards, > Chaos > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
