The acquarium, like the zoos, are touristic attraction. See Tripadvisor if you want to have a "reference". It also make sense to use attraction=animal instead of attraction=zoo or acquarium. Doing that you continue the progressive level of definitions. So, in my opinion you could describe the Acquario di Cattolica as follow
tourism=attraction attraction=animal name=Acquario di Cattolica Than you could add more details with animal=penguin;jaws;frog; etc... or maybe a more generic animal=fish Following this approach, you could even think to use differrent animal=* tags for the different pavilion/tanks. Ciao! FabC 2014-08-24 14:49 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <[email protected]>: > I'm not sure that would be right to categorize a feature like this as an > attraction. I see most of the attraction=* are used to tag singular things > like amusement park games. There are many attraction=animal that is vague > but I assume refer to more specific things than a zoo. > What i want represent is a complex structure like this, more like a zoo, > or a museum, subject to subtags like public facilities > http://en.acquariodicattolica.it/ > > Lorenzo > > > > Il giorno dom, 24/08/2014 alle 18.29 +0700, Dave Swarthout ha scritto: > > +1 for tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium > > > > I agree with Fabrizio on the use of the two-tag structure for aquaria. > > Cheers > > Dave > > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Fabrizio Carrai < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lorenzo, > > my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. > My rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags > combinations. If I wants to query for all and only acquariums, a query on > "attraction=acquarium" will work. Viceversa, if we rise one step above and > querying for "tourism=attraction", the acquarium tagged as > "tourism=acquarium" would not be reported, that is obviously not correct > (the acquarium is a touristic attraction). > > > > Ciao > > FabC > > > > 2014-08-24 3:18 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <[email protected]>: > > I would like to submit a new request to vote for the tag > tourism=aquarium. > > The proposal was first considered approved and then excluded due to lack > of feedback. > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Aquarium > > Actually exists a very poor permanent page but it is non connected at any > other but the proposal. I found also a german page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Daquarium > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Daquarium > > tourism=aquarium is actually used 186 times. It was 187 but someone moved > the one I had put in a simple tourism=attraction and this is why I am here > :) > > Other similar taggings i found: > tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium. 6 times > tourism=zoo + zoo=aquarium. 3 times > tourism=attraction + aquarium=yes. 1 time > tourism=zoo + aquarium=yes. 1 time > Several aquarium=yes have been used also for pet shops > > > Look forward for comments before updating the proposal page and sending > the request > > > Lorenzo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- *Fabrizio*
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
