> > And I feel like most of the values would better fit with a key like > amusement _ride= or amusement _ride:xxx=yes.
Now that you mentioned I just remembered. There is a proposal that uses the key attraction=* for describring objects from theme parks, zoos, etc. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:attraction So apparently the key attraction=* is already used for something else. 2014-08-25 7:40 GMT-03:00 Andreas Goss <andi...@t-online.de>: > +1, tourism=attraction is a poor scheme from the early days, maybe we >> should deprecate it all together, either without alternative or in favor of >> a flag like attraction=yes (or level0 - level 3 etc), or >> tourist_attraction=* >> > > I also just see it ending up in 2x tagging everything. leisure=waterpark > tourism=attraction + attraction=waterpark; amenity=restaurant > tourism=attraction + attraction=restaurant etc. > > And I feel like most of the values would better fit with a key like > amusement _ride= or amusement _ride:xxx=yes. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusement_ride > > I mean for example a kiddie_ride you find at a supermarket is not a > (tourist) attraction. > __________ > openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 > wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging