On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:53:32PM +0100, Colin Smale wrote: > > > Let's look at the entity relations in play here. Surely a club IS an > organisation, not a building. The club MAY USE one or more buildings, > and MAY OWN one or more buildings. A club HAS a contact address, HAS > members, HAS a "board" etc etc. So following the rules of "one object, > one set of tags", putting "club=chess" on a building could be considered > to be wrong, as the building may be used by several clubs. Bearing in > mind how some people hate multi-valued tags with semicolons, how about > "club:chess=meeting_place"? Then multiple clubs could use the same > building, each with a different role if required. Otherwise use a simple > node (per club) within the building to indicate some relationship > between the club and the building.
++1 Richard > > Colin > > On 2014-11-24 14:36, Richard Z. wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:13:07PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2014-11-24 13:57 GMT+01:00 Richard Z. <ricoz....@gmail.com>: According to > > the approved http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club [1] > > chess has an own club=chess, as has fishing, automobile, hiking - all of > > which can be either leisure type or sport type activities. I think > > "club=automobile" for a motorsport / racing club would not be very well > > chosen as this might really mean a lot of different things, some of them > > clearly neither "leisure" nor "sport", e.g. the "ADAC" (biggest German > > automobile club, almost every 4th German is a member, > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAC [2] ) does organize also some racing > > event, but is mostly seen as kind of insurance if your car breaks down (and > > as very strong political lobbyist advocating mainly individual motorized > > traffic). Documentation of the club tag is very scarse at the moment: > > http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:club [3] and I am not sure how it can be > > improved, e.g. if I wanted to write something about club=automobile, would I > have to write to all the mappers that have put these 127 club=automobile on > the map, to ask what they have used the tag for? > > I think much the same problem exists with other club=value as well like > club=chess? Nevertheless.. you may walk by a building with a tag > something > like a "chess-club" and if it is mapped as club=chess it is "correct". > It is also fairly un-informative but we are supposed to map what we see > and not do background checks of clubs with google or wikipedia? > > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [4] > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club > [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADAC > [3] http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:club > [4] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
