There is clearly problem with verifiability of this tag, as in my case I am frequently unsure which value should be used. And it is not even starting to cover problems with multiple people having different opinions.
It is not changing fact that there is no better tag to describe surface that is made of asphalt but of terrible quality. 2015-03-11 12:56 GMT+01:00 jgpacker <[email protected]>: > Hi, > I saw in the wiki page Key:smoothness > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness#Controversy> that > there > is a section about the controversy over it's verifiability. > > As far as I remember, this tag was throughly discussed here until a > consensus was achieved (which was that it should be classified according to > how usable the road is/which kinds of modes of transportation can use it). > > Is this claim over it's verifiability still current? > > I think it's not, and that this claim should be removed from the page > (though it may be useful to write a section with a brief history of this > key). > > Cheers, > John > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Current-status-of-the-key-smoothness-tp5836692.html > Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
