2015-03-12 2:53 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: > > The level of opposition -- regardless of the technical count -- indicates > the proposal can use some improvement. > I urge any person getting this level of opposition to reconsider, resolve > the issues, and resubmit. >
If you look at the actual comments, almost none of them are useful, sometimes already answered (but still repeated by following voters). E.g. - "It's not simple at all. Using amenity <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity>=* for this makes it impossible to combine it with such POIs. Also why amenity at all? For me it looks like a "I didn't find anything better", I mean amenity <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity>=reception_desk <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dreception_desk> can't even stand on its owm." with which POI should this be combined _on the same object_? I mean, this is a tag for a reception desk, obviously it can be combined with other amenities by putting it inside them, but you won't have many objects that are at the same time a reception desk and don't know, toilets? An example why this is a problem would help to understand the reservation. - this comment pops up several times (as the only reason for opposition): "The tag is related to tourism and not to amenity." but it was already answered: this is nothing particular to tourism, it can appear in all kinds of companies, administration contexts etc. - "vague, half-baked" is not a critic that helps to improve or even shows potential problems - "The proposal Sems to me too isolated, it should be embedded in an indoor tagging scheme." the voter wants a complete indoor tagging scheme and therefor opposes a tag that might be one of the first steps towards this? - " It should not be an amenity, the definition is vague, and in most cases this should go under indoor mapping, which is quite a complex subject." I didn't know "indoor mapping" was a different part of the project. You can discuss the vagueness of the definition, but to me "A Reception Desk provides a place where a visitor goes to gain information and or access to the facility e.g. could be in a motel, office, campsite. It has been suggested as an additional tag for a campsite .. but would be better as a general tag as reception desks occur in many other places." isn't too vague. - "This tag needs more time." not helping in any way to find potential problems. No substantial critique. the only useful point of critique is this one IMHO: " The reception is not necessarily a 'desk'." More than the proposal I think the reasoning for opposing the proposal would have to be improved. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
