+1 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:05 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2015-03-12 2:53 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]>: > >> >> The level of opposition -- regardless of the technical count -- indicates >> the proposal can use some improvement. >> I urge any person getting this level of opposition to reconsider, resolve >> the issues, and resubmit. >> > > > > If you look at the actual comments, almost none of them are useful, > sometimes already answered (but still repeated by following voters). E.g. > > > - "It's not simple at all. Using amenity > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity>=* for this makes it > impossible to combine it with such POIs. Also why amenity at all? For me it > looks like a "I didn't find anything better", I mean amenity > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity>=reception_desk > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dreception_desk> can't > even stand on its owm." > > with which POI should this be combined _on the same object_? I mean, this > is a tag for a reception desk, obviously it can be combined with other > amenities by putting it inside them, but you won't have many objects that > are at the same time a reception desk and don't know, toilets? An example > why this is a problem would help to understand the reservation. > > > > - this comment pops up several times (as the only reason for opposition): > "The tag is related to tourism and not to amenity." > > but it was already answered: this is nothing particular to tourism, it can > appear in all kinds of companies, administration contexts etc. > > > > - "vague, half-baked" is not a critic that helps to improve or even shows > potential problems > > > > - "The proposal Sems to me too isolated, it should be embedded in an > indoor tagging scheme." > > the voter wants a complete indoor tagging scheme and therefor opposes a > tag that might be one of the first steps towards this? > > > - " It should not be an amenity, the definition is vague, and in most > cases this should go under indoor mapping, which is quite a complex > subject." > > I didn't know "indoor mapping" was a different part of the project. You > can discuss the vagueness of the definition, but to me "A Reception Desk > provides a place where a visitor goes to gain information and or access to > the facility e.g. could be in a motel, office, campsite. It has been > suggested as an additional tag for a campsite .. but would be better as a > general tag as reception desks occur in many other places." isn't too vague. > > > - "This tag needs more time." > > not helping in any way to find potential problems. No substantial critique. > > > the only useful point of critique is this one IMHO: " The reception is not > necessarily a 'desk'." > > More than the proposal I think the reasoning for opposing the proposal > would have to be improved. > > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
