2015-03-18 0:58 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan <[email protected]>: > Your rule would mean that with 7/3 would be a rejection while 8/7 an > approval. > I suggest to not only bring the logic back but also address this issue. >
+1, I would like to reflect on the quorum rule. In the end, looking at how many people map and how many people take part in tagging mailing list discussions and voting on tags, any number we can reasonably put there will be ridiculous compared to the number of mappers. On this background there is not much difference between a vote of 6 people and one of 18. If we want to stick to the quorum (what does likely make sense to avoid the theoretical problem of one or two people alone "occupying" useful key or value names with unusual definitions), I suggest to lower it even more, like requiring at least 5 positive votes and a 2 third majority of positive votes (or "not more than one third negative votes"). Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
