On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 22:21 +0000, Dan S wrote: >.... > So here's how I would answer your question of how would "an interested > party [...] objectively determine what the discussion concluded": > instead of approved/rejected, some sort of visual widget on the wiki > page which summarised the {{yes}} and {{no}} with something like "76% > support [out of 98 opinions]". The poll would give a quick guide to > mappers, and encourage others to chip in with their opinion - any user > could add or remove their {{yes}}/{{no}} at any point. >
Certainly a different approach ! Quite a good one really. It meets my criteria of giving a new mapper some guidance on what he/she should use. Add in taginfo data. And maybe a list of competing approaches so, again, its clear to a new user what the options are. I do think we'd need to have some (usage determined ?) end point however. Who is going to register their approval of, eg, highway= this far down the track ? I think data consumers also need a bit of certainty too. David _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging