To make it clear: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:00 PM, moltonel 3x Combo <[email protected]> wrote: > Why should the page be "converted to a feature page" ?
Because I would mark a proposal page as such in some place. Otherwise a stable 10 year-old feature page cannot be easily distinguished from a proposal created yesterday. I see something like moving the page to a different namespace or removing a "proposal" status. Not changing the content or rewriting the page. > A good proposal > should already be nicely usable as documentation of the desired > tagging schema. Fully agree. > Note also that the feature <-> proposal relation is not one to one but > many to many. Any nontrivial proposal will link to multiple tags, and > a particular tag may link back to multiple competing proposals > > Yes, and the combined pages can be linked just like that. > Feature pages and proposals should be writen in parallel, not one > after the other. > > I am promoting writing a single "feature proposal" page, which, after the initial discussion, is made just a "feature" page. So nothing is written one after another. Cheers, Kotya
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
