On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:09 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote: > 1. Get a high level of classification of campsites based on the > relation between the land owner and the camper > 2. Get a classification of regular campsites based on available > facilities.
Agreed Jan. Different things. However, I think the vast majority of campers are also more interested in 2). Your Overlanders are an important group but a small minority. I think the term "camp_site" is an important resource and needs to be applied where most will be looking for it. So, to deal with 1), a fairly specialist need, you really need a new term that reflects that specialist need. Maybe camp_business_type=* ? David > I made the initial proposal to solve the first issue. I personally > look at mapping as an overlander, often staying in countries without > "normal" campsites. The discussion so far gives a reasonable picture > how the first item should be mapped, but we are struggling with the > exact tag names - camp_site= non_designated etc. (not being a native > speaker doesn't help here :-( ). I will update the proposal and can > bring it to voting on short notice. > > > > The second issue should be addressed with a different key > (camp_site_facilities=basic etc. or so). It requires more discussion > and has to have its own proposal. I will be hitting the road again in > about a month from now, therefore I don't want to own the second > proposal. > > > Bryce, as you seem to be very much interested in the second issue, > would you be willing to take this one? > > > Thanks, > > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
