I believe this is the issue here. For me bicycle=designated and bicycle=official don't say that a cycleway is mandatory. It only says that this way is meant for cyclist or is built for cyclist only. And while bicycle=official is mostly used for mandatory cycleways there are also cases where it is used for all way with a blue traffic sign or even all cycleways which are "official".
> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Poole [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Samstag, 28. März 2015 13:25 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligatory > > > I have to say that this adds yet another value to the bicycle tag that > doesn't solve any problems (note: if at all it naturally should be > "mandatory" however that is not my primary concern). > > We have bicycle=designated and bicycle=official for mandatory use > cycleways (where the concept of such exists). "official" already tries > to capture a nuance in a specific countries law that is lost on most > (and probably doesn't exist in reality) trying to differentiate further > doesn't make any sense (and we already have use_sidepath thrown in to > the mix). > > Simon _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
