> Am 28.03.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Simon Poole <[email protected]>: > > (nearby road > surfaces are already "nearby" in OSM data) in the case of several roads or different elevation (eg one of the ways on a steep hill separated by a retaining wall) it might still be very difficult or impossible to come to the correct conclusions just by analyzing a 2D projection of the situation These are surely very, very few exceptions, just wanted to mention that an explicit way is explicit while a spatial analysis in this case is an heuristic approach. cheers Marti _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=ob... Simon Poole
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycl... Hubert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bi... Simon Poole
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage ... Hubert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory u... Simon Poole
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Volker Schmidt
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Hubert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Hubert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Simon Poole
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Hubert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligato... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycl... fly
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=ob... Michael Reichert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=ob... Hubert
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligat... Volker Schmidt
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligat... Paul Johnson
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=ob... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=ob... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] RFC - obligatory usage - bicycle=obligat... Volker Schmidt
