You're right, the 'status' field in the template may look very official and
definitive, but going from approved to published is a step in a good direction.
Yves
Le 3 avril 2015 23:50:40 GMT+02:00, Warin <[email protected]> a écrit :
>On 4/04/2015 8:30 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>> Circling back to the proposal at hand:
>>
>> The notion is that the word "approved" has over the years repeatedly
>> contributed to confusion about the role of a wiki vote.
>> The proposal is to replace the word "approved" with the word
>"published".
>>
>
>Against. I don't think the word change will change that confusion.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Yves
>From my phone
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
