Dave,
I wasn't intending to have another try at camp_type=*.
We'll leave on our next trip in less than two weeks from now, so I don't
have the time. I also will be not able to complete another voting cycle
until I'll be without decent internet again.
Furthermore I haven't seen better proposals lately for the used definitions
and wording than what is in the proposal now.
Camp_type=non_designated is intended to be used under the following
conditions:
- Camping is legal, either because camping is allowed anywhere except...
(like in Sweden) or because the land owner has given explicit permission
(from my experience: police stations and mission stations in Africa)
- The place has a practical reason to be selected for camping. This can
be security or nearby presence of accessible amenities
- There are not many similar places in the environment. Places *not* to
be mapped:
- A place you select along the road to have a spot before it gets
dark (any other place will do in a safe country)
- A place you select solely for its natural beauty (other places
around; don't spoil it by sending everybody there)
- A farmer or (African) hamlet that gave you permission to use its
land if other farmers/hamlets will likely will do the same or if
you don't
want to abuse the hospitality of the land owner by directing other people
to it
I can see camp_site=basic and camp_type=non_designated got together
frequently as camp_site=* talks about available facilities and camp_type=*
talks about how the place is designated and managed
Regards,
Jan
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:12 AM John Willis <jo...@mac.com> wrote:
> Seems great !
>
> Javbw
>
>
> > On Apr 24, 2015, at 9:52 AM, David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 06:47 +0900, John Willis wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't want people to map known illegal camp sites or places they just
> happened to spend the night and think are nice but are on a farmers private
> property just to complete the map, as "map the ground truth" means mapping
> basic+non-designated camps if there was no mention of legality.
> > Ok, I have added a section, "Legal" Camp Sites, to the proposal page. It
> > says legal only. Mappers have responsibility to ensure accurate data
> > where they are mapping ...
> >
> > Please let me know what you think.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
