OK, I think the discussion on camp_site= has settled down and now concentrates on things that are just outside the current proposal and probably need to stay there for now. Thoughts, yes, no ?
I have mentioned on the proposal page tagging of individual pitches and declared that out of scope for now. I have added backcountry=yes as a possible tag to be used in association with this new tag If there are no objections or further suggestions, I'll move to voting in a day or so. please see - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Camp_Site David On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 14:23 +0300, Dave Swarthout wrote: > Would it not be ok to say (eg) - > > tourism=camp_site > camp_site=basic > backcountry=yes > > > That's exactly what I was proposing. It isn't a tag describing the > amenities of the camp so much as to indicate that it is a certain type > of camp, one not accessible by vehcles. In New Zealand I believe these > would be called trekking sites. I have no experience with Australia > but I'm guessing the term would mean the same thing. > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging