The fact that tools don't currently support something is no reason to oppose its introduction either. If it were, we would never be able to change anything.
On 2015-11-11 21:26, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:50:41 +0100 > Joachim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Many see _link only as slip roads. But using it for at-grade junctions >> like described in the wiki has one advantage: _link is usually tagged >> without a name because it connects two named roads and has none >> itself. Using no link gives many warning in QA tools. Using >> highway=residential plus noname=yes might be a workaround in the >> current situation. > > False positive in QA tool is not a good reason to force everybody to > handle residential_link, service_link etc > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
