On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:45:29 +0100 Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > No, I can't think of any real examples at the moment, but that doesn't > make them any less existable. And if they exist, then > highway=residential_link is more logical than forcing > highway=residential and adding link=yes or some other flag to > distinguish them. > > On 2015-11-10 17:19, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:54:45 +0100 > > Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Duck test: short link between two primaries is primary_link, so a > >> short link between two residentials is residential_link. The fact > >> that it is a very rare scenario does not detract from the fact that > >> it is existable. Why resort to a different tagging pattern if it > >> fits in the one we use for other analogous situations? > > > > I encountered many short links between highway=residential, every > > single one was clear highway=residential. > > > > For example see > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24789911#map=17/50.06036/19.92942 > > > > Can you provide an example of real situation where > > highway=residential_link makes sense? > For me expecting everybody to start handling residential_link is for worse than link=yes. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
