Dave Swarthout wrote > *If we move traffic_calming to the "Other highway features"category we > will > probably see more ways segmented into highway=residentialand > highway=traffic_calming bits, and I think that would be a step back.My > conclusion so far: the wiki is missleading and most mappers have learnedto > use traffic_calming=* without highway=traffic_calming, so I suggest to add > asimilar hint for deprecated tagging to the traffic_calming page* > > I reckon I wouldn't have a problem with doing that. I have always used > only > a node for the traffic_calming devices I've encountered but I can see how > splitting a way to make it a table or chicane might be problematical. But > then how would one tag a traffic_calming method that is not a node but a > section of the highway with some non-zero length?
We already have ~16000 ways tagged traffic_calming, I don't think that they cause problems. I don't fear the way segmentation, I fear that mappers use highway=traffic_calming for the small way segments when we tell them to use it for nodes. My understanding is that this is not wanted. Gerd (GerdP) -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/improve-tagging-of-traffic-calming-tp5860596p5860695.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
