I think what Gerd is saying is that if we deprecate the use of highway=traffic_calming and instead tag each way segment with just traffic_calming=* (or simply use a node in those case where the structure of the device is short), we would eliminate the issue where, for example, a secondary highway changes to highway=traffic_calming, and then back to highway=secondary, then back to highway=traffic_calming, and back to highway=secondary, etc.
Eliminating the highway=traffic_calming tag and using *only* the traffic_calming=* tag for those sections would be a better way to handle them. I'm starting to agree with him. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:19 AM, John Willis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Javbw > > > On Nov 22, 2015, at 9:35 AM, John Willis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > large sections of them on rural roads before dangerous curves > > These are heavily signed as being dangerous to fast moving motorcycles in > the curves, so they are a good thing to map. They have them there to make > the motorcyclists slow down on the roads (per the warning signs I have > seen). > > These are what I would map as way segments. > > https://goo.gl/maps/Mz26VkaF6j62 > > Javbw > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
