Besides the way segmentation, which I don't care about at all (because it more accurately reflects the realities of the road) - does tagging a way segment with traffic_calming=* present a problem? I realize then I can't use highway=traffic_calming on the way (because it is already highway=secondary or something), but it is a better representation of the road.
If I have 25-50m of rumble strips, isn't it better to map that 1 time on a way segment, instead of having 200 points marking each individual strip? There are individual rumble strips (or very small sets) on the motorways to warn of tollbooths, but there are very large sections of them on rural roads before dangerous curves. > On Nov 22, 2015, at 1:07 AM, Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > In case of Japan my opinion is that it would be better to invest the time > into the existing big alignment problems caused by imports and "bad" Bing > images. I map where I have visited, and where imagery allows. Thus, I have tried mapping (forgotten) rural towns in mountainous Areas that usually have horrible imagery. This allows me to have a good idea of how to interpret ambiguous arial imagery. I try to map it as detailed as the imagery allows. For popular places, I micromap objects at tourist locations as much as I can. Currently, the only traffic calming devices I have found are rumble strips, humps, and pinch points. I have not seen a table yet. Javbw _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
