ok I don't have a neutral opinion on this proposal, but I think especially here, if you want to change 20.000 tagged objects, it should be three quarters.
On 23.02.2016 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I feel voting count is broken for some time. Has there been a formal > proceduce to change the way we count the votes? How was this procedure > introduced? > > Example, the current jeweller voting: > Voting closed > Voting on this proposal has been closed. > It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against and 4 > abstentions. > Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional rejection; > proposer to make final call. > > > Shall we really require three quarters approvement for a vote to pass? Even > to change the constitution, in many countries you do not need more approval > than two thirds. > > Cheers, > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
0x3CBE432B.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
