The reality is that most mappers don't pay any attention to this group or the "decisions" we make. It's all well and good to make careful deliberations about this tag or that one but in the end people will do what they want. They will continue to tag for the renderer, add tags that make no sense or aren't orthogonal to the main tag, add non-existent names to their favorite features (name="Dad's house") and there's not much we can do about it.
Sixty-two votes is actually a fair showing as these things go. It's only when you take into account that, according to Andy'e estimate, "around 1100 individual mappers last edited a jewellery shop" that it looks weak. Anyway, now that the proposal has been "voted down" does that mean the tag description will change in the Wiki? On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:54:55 +0000 > Andy Townsend <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 23/02/2016 10:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against > > > and 4 abstentions. > > > Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional > > > rejection; proposer to make final call. > > > > The tricky bit of course is that those percentages are "of the people > > who voted". > > It is not surprising that only people who voted were voting. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
