On 20 March 2016 at 00:12, Alexander Matheisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you have a look at the highway=* tagging: This scheme is subjective, > but there is no alternative. Poppycock. > As the person who created that station importance draft, I will focus > on stations, but for other features like mountain peaks the situation > should be similar: It is not possible to calculate the importance of a > station just by some values. How do you calculate it, then? Rolling dice? > I also see problems in getting some of the proposed values. For > example, the amount of passengers or trains per time is difficult to > measure for a mapper and is not easy to be checked by other mappers. Please explain what measure you are using, that is *more easily checked* by other mappers. > I also see the problem that calculating the importance by a complex > algorithm might be very intransparent. Please explain what measure you are using, that is *more transparent*. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
