Am Montag, den 21.03.2016, 23:26 +0100 schrieb Daniel Koć: > Interesting idea worth testing, IMO. However I suspect in practice > there > will be lot of problems to make it really fly. > > Let's look at the similar simple idea (with scoring based on city > type > and population) used to render city labels in osm-carto in a more > sane > way: > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/1461 > > Almost 5 months of discussing and hand tweaking the algorithm tells > me > just having the hard (numerical) data might be not as easy as you > depict > it. Raw population data is far from having world-range city ranking > we > needed.
+1 > Maybe the key name should not be "importance" - I just took an > existing/proposed scheme with some nice defined values and tried to > extend its scope outside just the railways. While for example "range" > may be good for transportation, it wouldn't work with peaks, of > course. I am open for other key names. range sounds good and might be a might be a better word for this key. On the other hand, the exact name of the key is not that important. It is just a kind of placeholder and a detailled definition should be delivered in the wiki or in tagging presets. Regards Alex
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
