I think you miss the point. When there's no service key, you have no idea whether it doesn't fit in the current set of (parking_aisle, driveway...), or it is indeed but hasn't been tagged because the mapper didn't provide this information. It's an informational consistency problem, peculiarity of the way we handle things, namely non-distinction between "inapplicable" and "unknown".
Michał On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > >> Il giorno 15 apr 2016, alle ore 13:40, Tom Pfeifer <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> >> Values for mini-vote: >> >> service=main >> service=access >> service=major > > > main and major seem a bit odd (after all, service roads are minor roads, so > that would be a "major minor road"? access on the other hand is what all > service roads are about (access to a house, a facility, a row of parking lots > etc.) > > I still don't see the need for subtagging service roads with a tag that > unlike the well introduced qualifiers says that it's not a less important > than a generic service road >> >> Proposed description: >> >> Voluntary sub-tag for a highway=service for distinguishing a major service >> way >> from sub-ordinated ways, or generally classify it into the major category. >> Examples are the access way into a parking lot (distinguished from >> parking_aisle), >> or a service way connecting several residential driveways. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
