2016-05-20 11:01 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer <[email protected]>: > We probably need to adapt the definition for OSM, since otherwise > the very popular building=roof would fall through. >
I think it might not (fall through), at least accorcing to the German LBO §2,(2) they would still be considered buildings (if you can go under it), as the requirement is "cover", not "enclosure". But there are other structures that might (fall through). Looking at common values http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/building#values I noticed these for exmple: - storage_tank 12862 - houseboat 11702 (well, if they are intended to remain at the same spot, they might eventually be, in LBO (Landesbauordnung) that's §2,(1) ("oder wenn die Anlage nach ihrem Verwendungszweck dazu bestimmt ist, überwiegend ortsfest benutzt zu werden."). - slurry_tank 6412 - transformer_tower 5232 - tank 3466 - dam 3379 - silo 2877 Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
