> Op 20 mei 2016, om 10:51 heeft Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende geschreven: > > Actually the dutch wikipedians DO classifiy a greenhouse (kas) as nl:gebouw, > from wikipedia.nl <http://wikipedia.nl/> "Kas(gebouw)": > "De traditionele negentiende-eeuwse kas was een gebouw dat werd > aangetroffen..."
Martin, Earlier in this topic you wrote: > "Yes, the term "building" has a more narrow meaning in language than what it > is used for in OSM, and wikipedia reflects this, still, for OSM the osm wiki > is relevant, not wikipedia.” That’s what I do also. I don’t care what wikipedia is writing if all my fellow countryman are talking about “De kassen in het Westland” and not “De gebouwen in het Westland”. I agree with you that Palm House in Kew Gardens [1] could be considered a building, but this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Westland_kassen.jpg <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Westland_kassen.jpg> is by not one single person in the Netherlands called a “building" or a "group of buidlings”. And in my use of the word “green_house” is was referring to the latter. Marc. [1] https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kas_%28gebouw%29#/media/File:Kew_Gardens_Palm_House,_London_-_July_2009.jpg <https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kas_(gebouw)#/media/File:Kew_Gardens_Palm_House,_London_-_July_2009.jpg>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
