Le vendredi 14 octobre 2016 à 17:48 +0700, Dave Swarthout a écrit : > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gm > ail.com> wrote: > > both can be valid. Building is for the building (type), while > > amenity is for the feature / service (i.e. a place which operates, > > while a building could also be used for different purpose now, or > > not by used any more, and still remain of the bakehouse typology). > > Agree. No problem with English usage. The building is just that, a > physical structure, while amenity=baking_oven defines what that > building contains or offers. > From what I understand, I updated the proposal to use it on "building" only. Please correct me if you think I am wrong.
I also documented a bit more the complementary usage with other tags/keys. Regard, Yvan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
