Le vendredi 14 octobre 2016 à 17:48 +0700, Dave Swarthout a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gm
> ail.com> wrote:
> > both can be valid. Building is for the building (type), while
> > amenity is for the feature / service (i.e. a place which operates,
> > while a building could also be used for different purpose now, or
> > not by used any more, and still remain of the bakehouse typology).
> Agree. No problem with English usage. The building is just that, a
> physical structure, while amenity=baking_oven defines what that
> building contains or offers.
From what I understand, I updated the proposal to use it on "building"
only. Please correct me if you think I am wrong.

I also documented a bit more the complementary usage with other


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Tagging mailing list

Reply via email to