On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> building=* has never been about "purpose" though, it is about architectural > type (form, shape, function, structure, etc.). The purpose is what leads > (amongst other criteria) to choosing an architectural type, so there is a > link between the two, and it seems this might be creating some confusion. I see you saying this another time, but I doubt it's as common opinion as you make it to appear. Using "purpose" for building differentiation is quite standard in mapping (to name a few - BDOT Polish topographic maps, all the different cadastre maps and so on. And that's how I've seen it used in OSM, too. Michał _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
