* Michał Brzozowski <[email protected]> [170413 16:41]: > I don't see how going from "typology" you conclude it's strictly about > form. Typology is about types, not saying with respect to what. > When you look at top building values in Taginfo, it's clear to me > these state purpose (house, residential, garage, apartments, > industrial, school and so on), with only exception being hut, other > non-purpose values from the first page are in fact non-buildings > (roof).
I'm in between here: building typology would depend on the original purpose of the building, but that would not necessary still be the current purpose of the building. So, if a building had originally been constructed as a church and is built in the style of a church, but is now used as a restaurant, it would be tagged amenity=restaurant, building=church. Wolfgang (lyx@osm) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
