On Thursday, 11 May 2017, Bjoern Hassler wrote: > HI Phil, hi Colin, > > in the case of 4a/4b etc I would put in different stop points. If 4a always > serves one route, then 4a would be added to the route relation. Maybe if 4a > / 5a / 6a can all serve the same route, then I don't know what the solution > is.... Maybe you just add a new stop point somewhere, and add a note? Or > put 4a/5a/6a into a relation, and add the relation? (That would be against > the spec at the moment I think... but could be a solution.) > The problem is that the real world is not as simple as the London Underground, the big big issue is to define the routes. Really not easy as a route is a combination of start, destination and stations served. Something even a geek like me finds bewildering if I was to try to map rail routes.
Your average passenger just knows where a train is going, or at least where they are going. Trains are regularly split/merged/reversed on routes. A train to a destination can be on one of many routes, some may only operate weekly despite appearing to most as a regular service. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Jolla _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
