> * Can I or would you add an example subsection with pictures giving at least > the different situations depicted with fire_hydrant:type key ?
Of course you can, Francois: any contriubution is welcome. > With fire_hydrant:couplings, you have to guess what this means. > Without reading the wiki, somebody can tag fire_hydrant:couplings=yes or > fire_hydrant:couplings=2 for exemple. > Sata will be of lower quality > if you want to avoid a generic subname :type, I think that should be > fire_hydrant:couplings_type the same with for fire_hydrant:couplings_size What do other mappers think about this? Is fire_hydrant:couplings_type or fire_hydrant:couplings:type better? And the same question for size. Alberto --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
