Hi Martin, Thanks for the response.
1. Whether the building is permanent or not. > what are your definitions for semipermanent and non-permanent? So non-permanent is a building structure constructed for a defined short period of time. Like Circus tent for example. It stays there for a defined 1 month. I can also imagine temporary warehouses / tents during the harvest period at countryside-marketplaces or movable markets, though I cannot really give a good real-life example. Something like this: https://goo.gl/images/nMf3gQ <https://goo.gl/images/nMf3gQ> Semi-permanent are constructions that are technically non-permanent but stay there for an indefinite amount of time. Something like we have a trailer house that just stays there and it’s not intended to be moved anytime in future. This differentiation is confusing however it is important to make this differentiation - semi-permanent buildings usually have a stronger strategic value then non-permanent. In case of evacuation - non-permanent structures can be easily deconstructed or abandoned, but semi-permanent might not. And the inhabitants might be less resistant to get evacuated if they inhabit semi-permenent structure comparing to permanent building. 2. Whether the building is permanent or not. So do you think it a good idea to map existence of basement of the building by building_levels:underground = yes 3. Shape of the building > we map the shape (maximum of all horizontal sections of all levels) in > geometry (way) We need this for statistic purposes. To make it human-readable, the proposal was to have values like {box, rectangular, t-shaped, l-shaped}. Ideally a classifier can be trained to derive these values from raw way geometry, but we still need to come up with reasonable common building shapes that are acceptable to be included in OSM data. Any suggestions? 4. Slope of the site where building is located. > we don't map it. Where would you attach this tag to? Attached to building. The damage form disasters like flood will be highly-related to this surface slope. Again thanks a lot for your feedback. Best, Taras. > On 27 Jul 2017, at 1:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > On 27. Jul 2017, at 07:14, Vozniuk Taras <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> 1. Whether the building is permanent or not. >> Users select from the following preset {permanent, semi-permanent, >> non-permanent} . Cannot really find an appropriate tag for this. >> > > > what are your definitions for semipermanent and non-permanent? > > > >> 2. If building contains a basement. >> Should we use basement={yes, no}, or building:basement={yes, no} > > > the established tags are quantifying the number of levels: > > building_levels={overground levels} > building_levels:underground=* > ...:roof=* > > >> >> 3. Shape of the building. >> We need to tag the shape of building polygon. Possible selection from >> {t-shaped, l-shaped, multi-projected, box, rectangular}. >> I have’t found any information regarding tagging building shape, I guess it >> is not a common practice, right? We need to know the shape of the building >> that affects the resistance of the structure to natural disasters like >> earthquake or flood. >> Any recommendations for the appropriate tag and selection here? > > > we map the shape (maximum of all horizontal sections of all levels) in > geometry (way), and if needed also the shape of parts (building:part=*). > There's also a tag roof:shape > > > >> >> 4. Slope of the site where building is located. >> Selection from {flat, moderate, steep}. Can we use incline tag for this? > > > we don't map it. Where would you attach this tag to? > > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
