On 8/17/17 10:25 AM, Eric Christensen wrote: > > That's not really what's being discussed here. A non-pressurized > hydrant wouldn't be attached to a tank at all. It would require a fire > engine to suck the water out. It does not look like a traditional fire > hydrant at all. there are always exceptions. not far from me, there's a traditional hydrant of the type normally used with pressurized systems, but it's sourced from a pond. the reason is that the pond is elevated, some distance from the road, and they need to keep the barrel empty when it's not in use for the usual reasons.
richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
