On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Mark Wagner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:20:57 -0400 > Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > By the same token it's possible to imagine separate > > foot:permit:website=*, snowmobile:permit:website=* - separated by > > transportation mode. > > The Inland Empire Paper forests around Mount Spokane: > > permit:website=https://www.quality-service-inc.com/ > inland-empire-paper-company/ > ski:permit:website=http://parks.state.wa.us/147/Sno-Park-Permit-Vendors > > (Incidentially, "access:snowmobile=no".) > I'm not astonished. As I said, there used to be examples around here. I'm not sure that http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/2574.html doesn't ever overlay atop another permit scheme, although it wouldn't surprise me. Except that 'snowmobile' is usually a top-level transportation mode, so just 'snowmobile=no' in your case. > Seems to me that "permit:ski:website" makes more sense, though. > > Putting it in the 'permit' namespace rather than the 'ski' namespace. Yeah, I guess given the subtags, that makes sense. Not something I feel strongly about, so let's make it so.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
