Is there a risk that people will start adding access=permit to everything in a country for which you need to have a visa to enter the country ? Or even worse, to all streets with motor_vehicle=permit because you need a driver license and a number plate for your car ?
This the proposal excluding those extreme cases ? regards m. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2017-09-18 17:29 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kenny <[email protected]>: >> >> I am told that access=permit is >> the same thing as access=private (which, as far as I can determine, is >> also no different from access=no). I accept that. > > > > it depends what "permit" actually means: > > 1) can it be obtained by everybody meeting clearly defined, easy to comply > (e.g. filling out a form with your name and intended time of stay) criteria > (=you have a right, if the administration doesn't grant the permit > nonetheless you meet the requirements, you could sue them), > > 2) or is it typically given to "everybody", but if they decide you don't get > it you can't do anything. > > 3) Or is obtaining the permit linked to requisites which are found only in > very few people (e.g. living in an area). > > > The case 3 and maybe 2 could reasonably be approximated with private, while > the first and maybe second would merit a new tag IMHO (cases 1 and 2 could > also have 2 tags: access=permit and another one stating whether you have a > right to get the permit). I'm not sure about case 2. > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
