2017-10-02 13:21 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert <[email protected]>:
> > > What are your opinions? I agree that features which have been rejected in proposal voting should not get a feature definition page, at least not if they are disputed and not used in significant numbers (there will still be the proposal page to document them). If used in significant numbers but still disputed (and rejected), they should get a bold hint on top, ideally with reference to related discussion. Significant amendments, changes and removals to/from feature definition pages after voting should at least be discussed beforehand (when documenting common practise) and/or should be voted on as well. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
