You're talking about things like this ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel
Have those all been discussed ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Seamark_Object_Usage When is it "low usage" ? And how should usage appear (in a structured way), if it's not documented ? There's also low usage on those (as there aren't many yet) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport There was a bunch of different values before, as everybody mapped it the way he/her thought it might be right. I didn't understand how those (motorcycle) tags might cause others to be "not identifiable any more". There weren't "various comments of other mappers", there were mainly various comments by Warin61 : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/motorcycle_friendly Am 03.10.2017 um 11:52 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > 2017-10-03 11:34 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug <th...@gmx.de > <mailto:th...@gmx.de>>: > > Please describe which 'problems' you fear to appear if it's not > deleted. > > > > If everybody creates feature pages for his personal, low usage > features, the wiki looses it's function of documenting the generally > used and established features, as they are not identifiable any more. > You already have the proposal page, which states that this is a > proposal, and documents the tags, no need to create confusion and > clutter with a feature page that is not justified at this point. > > In the discussions about this tag, there have also been various > comments of other mappers, that explained why they think that these > tags are not suitable, so it should probably considered disputed. > > Cheers, > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging