Le 03. 10. 17 à 11:52, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > > 2017-10-03 11:34 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > Please describe which 'problems' you fear to appear if it's not deleted. > > If everybody creates feature pages for his personal, low usage features, > the wiki looses it's function of documenting the generally used and > established features, as they are not identifiable any more. You already > have the proposal page, which states that this is a proposal, and > documents the tags, no need to create confusion and clutter with a > feature page that is not justified at this point. > > In the discussions about this tag, there have also been various comments > of other mappers, that explained why they think that these tags are not > suitable, so it should probably considered disputed.
+1 and more, if you delete the banners that warn the problem, it is clearly an intention to mislead people and / or manipulate the result of the invalid vote of the proposal, which in my opinion alone justifies a radical clarification to make the difference between "a mapper creates a lot of tag for its use" and "a validated proposal which allows to "guarantee" a research of quality and opinion predominantly positive" take a look at its history of massive new tag creation while the majority are current proposals > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?limit=500&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Rtfm&namespace=&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&year=2017&month=-1 it is obviously how he work to add tags he want in "in use", it is problematic Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
