we probably need to work on "default values". but no one seems motivated to work on the proposal.
Le 16. 01. 18 à 11:52, Matej Lieskovský a écrit : > Ok, once again: I am sorry for even mentioning something that is > actually documented on the wiki. I've since then thought about the data > model and I can see how problematic it would be. Can we please move on > to finding a solution? > > On 16 January 2018 at 09:25, Simone Saviolo <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 2018-01-15 11:07 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > On 14. Jan 2018, at 12:32, Matej Lieskovský > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > If you create a single empty relation with the details of the > parking zone rules, > > you can then tag every road with the id of the relation. > > It is basically a way of flipping the relation system around, > > problem is with the following mappers, how would they find out > there is such a relation and that they should add it to the road > they newly added? If this kind of mapping started to become more > established I imagine people would spend a lot of time looking > for those empty relations with the tags? > > > Not to mention that it would make for very poor data quality. It > would establish a user-maintained (or rather, to-be-maintained) > relationship between data; it would go over the software's head, and > the database wouldn't know the least bit about it. From a practical > point of view, when would an empty relation be downloaded? Never, if > it has no members: which means that mappers would generally be > anaware that such a thing even exists. > > In conclusion, you're suggesting a method that the machine couldn't > help us with, and that mappers would have a very hard time (if not > impossible) using correctly. > > Regards, > > Simone _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
