Citation provided: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Size https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Size
Notice that the border relation you linked is already version 790 (and borders change far less often than roads). Viewing the relation on osm.org already takes some time on my PC, I'd hate to have to import it into JOSM. If you don't think that is bad enough, try working with this relation: https://osm.org/relation/912311 On 14 January 2018 at 14:45, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 12:32:02 +0100 > Matej Lieskovský <[email protected]> wrote: > > > if you group all the streets in a single relation, the relation is > > likely to be rather big. > > This can be hard on the server. > > [citatation needed] > > We have massive boundary relation > ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/49715 for example) and AFAIK > everything works fine. > > Is this performance concern is confirmed by anything? Messages from > people handling OSM servers, profiling, anything like that? >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
