> > This is indeed problematic. A lot of use cases preprocess osm data and > filter out separate/parallel cycleways and paths. It would be nice to > have a compromise in the wiki as to suggest that a minimum of tags on > the motorized way should remain _even if_ a parallel way exists.
I would love to have this confirmed by the makers of e.g. navigation software. It is not clear to me whether you are a data consumer that has this problem or whether you think they might have a problem. If you know that there is information about cycleways on separate "osm ways", why filter them out ? I wonder how different this is e.g. by filtering out all buildings and then complaining that house numbers are missing because you can only process address points. There is a rule One Feature, One Object in OSM. [1] It seems to me that anything besides a tag similar to cycleway=separate is breaking this rule regards. m. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
