> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018 um 14:50 Uhr > Von: "Mateusz Konieczny" <[email protected]> > An: "Christian Müller" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Sidewalks and cycleways as tags vs as extra lines > > Also, I am curious whatever you think that it is self-explanatory and > easier to understand than cycleway=opposite.
cycleway:left=lane|track cycleway:left:oneway=-1 This may not be completely self-explanatory either, e.g. you would have to mention if cycleway:left:oneway is processed in or without dependence on a possibly existing oneway=* tag describing the general oneway status for motorized traffic. It probably makes sense to process it independently, because only then it can be used in a consistent manner on non-oneway streets. To deduct if you're dealing with an opposite cycleway (as the osm wiki defines it now) in a oneway street, you'd need to compare oneway=* and cycleway:left:oneway=* values. The reason you think cycleway=opposite is easy to understand, is because it has had lots of "page views" and the specialities around it have be- come implicit knowledge of the people using it, I suppose. Beating me might change that, of course. If you consider its current use case (appending a differently coloured arrow in opposite direction to the one that denotes oneway streets in e.g. mapnik), then, for this use case, the betold imprecision does not matter, but for anything else it may be too sloppy. Greetings cm _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
