> 10 May 2018 16:58:23 +0200 Mateusz Konieczny > <[email protected]>: >> 10. May 2018 14:57 by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>: >> # currently missing: right-before-left/left-before-right >> >> Since there is no tag for this, I guess it's reasonable to define >> one the same way as for 4-way-stops. I think highway=give_way and >> give_way=all or default (analog to maxheight) makes the most sense >> (currently give_way=all is used 3 times worldwide). >> >> If right-before-left or left-before-right should be decided by the >> national boundary, not on any intersecting node. > give_way=no_priority? Yeah, this one sounds better.
> 10 May 2018 16:53:30 by Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>: >> 10. May 2018 14:57 by [email protected]: >> Hey guys, >> # currently missing: priority road by road design >> A lowered curb at a street on an intersection makes this road to >> yield, without the need for a sign (in Germany) >> I think we should tag this separately since there are no signs >> involved. I have currently no idea how to tag this. > Wiki already documents that highway=give_way is for > "Used to mark give way (also known as yield) signs or markings" > > I would consider it as a form of marking, close to painted signs like > at > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Junction_of_Cleveland_Road_and_Ratcliffe_Close_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1518836.jpg > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Junction_of_Cleveland_Road_and_Ratcliffe_Close_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1518836.jpg> Thanks for the hint, this sounds like we should add a subtag, like give_way:type=[curb, road_marking, sign, inferred] or give_way=[curb, road_marking, sign, inferred] (since this tag has zero usage currently this also works for stop=* or stop:type=*. The last value can be used when it's obvious, but no special markings can be found (already discovered two such spots in my surroundings today). Since I'm not a native English speaker, correct me when I misuse this word. :) > 10 May 2018 16:53:30 by Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>: > PS You may wish to make shorter mails in future and try to tackle one > issue at once > > (maybe with link to essay describing all related concepts). > > It will avoid tl;dr problem. Well, thanks. I thought a not so cluttered way to deliver all necessary information would be better. It's actually hard to break down since all approaches currently focus on just one specific topic. I like to fix this with a step back and a look at the whole picture, to find an evenly acceptable solution for all cases. Best regards, Ruben _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
