23. May 2018 07:15 by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>: > > On 23/05/18 16:25, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > >> >> >> >> 22. May 2018 23:03 by >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> : >> >> >>> On 23/05/18 07:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours:sign%3Dno >>>> >>>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/opening_hours:sign%3Dno> >>>> >>>> All comments are welcomed! >>> >>> Could not this information be included in the note tag? >> >> My entire motivation for making this tag is to record this data >> >> in machine-readable form. I want to make my detector of things to >> survey to stop suggesting opening hours that are not worth surveying. >> >> >> >> >> Proposal page links to already implemented and used code. >> >> >> >> >> It would be impossible with note field, >> >> without forcing all mappers to use >> >> >> specific phrase to record it (in one language across the world), >> >> what is undesirable. >> > Ok, that is a fine reason. Might want to make that clear on the > proposal page? I added more explicit note why new tag is preferred over note. > What about similar tags for missing address signs? If one needs it something similar may be also used. addr:housenumber:sign=no? addr:sign = no? But I would leave it for somebody who needs this tag.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
